|
UPT. PERPUSTAKAAN
Universitas Esa Unggul
Kampus Emas UEU - Jakarta Barat
|
Phone |
: |
021-5674223, ext 282 |
Fax |
: |
|
E-mail |
: |
[email protected] |
Website |
: |
http://library.esaunggul.ac.id
|
Support (Customer Service) :
|
[email protected] |
|
|
Welcome..guys!
|
Have a problem with your access?
Please, contact our technical support below:
|
LIVE SUPPORT
Astrid Chrisafi
|
! ATTENTION !
To facilitate the activation process, please fill out the member application form correctly and completely
Registration activation of our members will process up to max 24 hours (confirm by email). Please wait patiently
Still Confuse?
Please read our User Guide
|
|
UEU » Scientific Articles » Hukum Posted by [email protected] at 04/03/2021 00:39:21 • 987 Views
KEABSAHAN KONTRAK ELEKTRONIK BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 11 TAHUN 2008 TENTANG INFORMASI DAN TRANSAKSI ELEKTRONIK JUNCTO KITAB UNDANG-UNDANG HUKUM PERDATACreated by :
Joko Widarto ( 0326067103 )
Subject: | INFORMASI TRANSAKSI ELEKTRONIK | Alt. Subject : | ELECTRONIC CONTRACT | Keyword: | TEKNOLOGI ASPEK HUKUM |
Description:
Perkembangan teknologi informasi, khususnya internet, memberikan banyak manfaat dan
kemudahan bagi aktivitas kehidupan manusia. Namun, pada sisi lain perkembangan teknologi
informasi juga membawa permasalahan baru, khususnya dalam aspek hukum. Kontrak elektronik
sebagai salah satu bentuk transaksi yang saat ini mengalami perkembangan pesat juga tidak
terlepas dari masalah dalam pelaksanaannya. Dari aspek hukum timbul permasalahan mengenai
keabsahan suatu kontrak elektronik dan permasalahan mengenai dapat atau tidaknya suatu kontrak
elektronik dijadikan sebagai alat bukti dalam persidangan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk melihat
apakah suatu kontrak elektronik dapat dikatakan sah dan bagaimana kekuatan pembuktian dan
keabsahan kontrak elektronik jika dikemudian hari terjadi sengketa antara para pihak, khususnya di
Indonesia. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian deskriptif analitis dengan pendekatan yuridis normatif.
Data dalam penelitian ini diperoleh dari penelitian kepustakaan dan wawancara dengan dua orang
notaris, empat orang pelaku usaha kontrak elektronik, e-commerce. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan
bahwa terdapat perbedaan pendapat mengenai keabsahan kontrak elektronik dan kekuatan
pembuktian dan keabsahan kontrak elektronik sebagai alat bukti (tidak sah dan tidak dapat dijadikan
sebagai alat bukti), para pelaku usaha kontrak elektronik e-commerce (kontrak elektronik adalah
sah dan dapat dipergunakan sebagai alat bukti yang sah sama seperti dokumen kontrak
konvensional), para notaris (satu orang notaris berpendapat bahwa kontrak elektronik adalah sah
dan dapat digunakan sebagai alat bukti; satu orang notaris berpendapat bahwa kontrak yang
dilakukan secara elektronik dapat dikatakan sah namun masih sulit untuk dapat diterima sebagai
alat bukti). hasil penelitian ini dapat disimpulkan bahwa masih terdapat perbedaan pandangan
mengenai keabsahan kontrak elektronik dan kekuatan kontrak elektronik yang dilakukan secara
online sebagai alat bukti jika merujuk kepada KUHAP.
Alt. Description
The development of information technology, especially the internet, provides many benefits and
conveniences for human life activities. However, on the other hand, the development of information
technology also brings new problems, especially in the legal aspect. Electronic contracts, as a form
of transaction which is currently experiencing rapid development, cannot be separated from problems
in its implementation. From the legal aspect, problems arise regarding the validity of an electronic
contract and problems regarding whether or not an electronic contract can be used as evidence in
court. This study aims to see whether an electronic contract can be said to be valid and how the
strength of proof and validity of an electronic contract in the future if there is a dispute between the
parties, especially in Indonesia. This research is a descriptive analytical study with a normative
juridical approach. The data in this study were obtained from literature research and interviews with
two notaries, four business actors in electronic contracts, e-commerce. The results show that there
are differences of opinion regarding the validity of electronic contracts and the strength of proof and
validity of electronic contracts as evidence (invalid and cannot be used as evidence), e-commerce
electronic contract business actors (electronic contracts are valid and can be used as evidence).
legal evidence is the same as conventional contract documents), notaries (one notary believes that
an electronic contract is valid and can be used as evidence; one notary is of the opinion that a
contract that is carried out electronically can be said to be valid but it is still difficult to be accepted
as evidence; evidence). The results of this study can be concluded that there are still differences in
views regarding the validity of electronic contracts and the strength of electronic contracts conducted
online as evidence when referring to the Criminal Procedure Code.
Date Create | : | 04/03/2021 | Type | : | Text | Format | : | pdf | Language | : | Indonesian | Identifier | : | UEU-Article-5_0699 | Collection ID | : | 5_0699 |
Source : Tulisan karya ilmiah
Relation Collection: Fakultas Hukum
Coverage : Civitas Akademika Universitas Esa Unggul
Rights : @2021 Perpustakaan Universitas Esa Unggul
Publication URL : https://digilib.esaunggul.ac.id/keabsahan-kontrak-elektronik-berdasarkan-undangundang-nomor-11-tahun-2008-tentang-informasi-dan-transaksi-elektronik-juncto-kitab-undangundang-hukum-perdata-19179.html
[ Free Download - Free for All ]
- UEU-Article-19179-5_0699.pdf - 704 KB
[ FullText Content - Please, register first ]
...No Files...
10 Similar Document...
No similar subject found !
10 Related Document...
|
POLLINGBagaimana pendapat Anda tentang repository kami ?
Visitors Today : 4
Total Visitor : 1970002
Hits Today : 33507
Total Hits : 154449835
Visitors Online: 1
Calculated since 16 May 2012
You are connected from 172.17.121.29 using Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko; compatible; ClaudeBot/1.0; [email protected])
|